Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deacon Seraphim Hart's avatar

This brought back memories of my "emergent church" days. We would arrange couches in a semi-circle and the one giving a talk ("talk," generally, not "sermon," certainly not "homily") might lean against a stool in front of the TV where the PowerPoint slides would be projected. That setup wasn't about being an audience at all. In fact this "home church" arrangement was a rejection of the church-as-concert arrangement of the mega church, seen as lacking the depth of true community. The seating suggests a family sitting around talking through the Gospel together, a far cry from "when you are sitting you are an audience member who is watching the service." The difference seems to be the awesome mystery of the Eucharist. The thing uniting us is not simply a shared life, but shared participation in the Body and Blood of Christ. And how could you not stand in the presence of a miracle? It would be like staying seated at a birth or a death; like the elder brother in Rembrandt’s Return of the Prodigal Son who cannot be bothered to stand up. As Rigel points out, this is its own image of church-as-family, but in a different mode. We just save the sitting for fellowship hour!

Rigel Thurston's avatar

One of the first things I noticed about visiting our church is it was hard to tell who belonged to who. There are little clusters of families and godparents, a child bolts to the front—picked up by another parishioner. A four-year-old orbits his mom, who’s holding an infant who's making eyes at an elderly man behind her—little galaxies interconnected by laughter and crying, and incense soaked in imperfect singing. It’s alive. It also kinda redefines the modern conception of “family.”

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?